Social Loafing Tendencies Team Performance-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Social Loafing Tendencies Team Performance? Answer: Introducation From a young age, I had always dreamt of developing an innovative idea that would help me venture into business and create employment opportunities for people in my country especially the youths. When I joined college, I knew I had a more exceptional operations to develop my dreams of being an innovative entrepreneur. In contrary to the first semester of the school all student were required during the second semester to focus on their central subject matters ( see the blog (1).July 2017). One of my chosen subject matter was on design thinking. I chose design thinking because I wanted to explore complex methods that I can use in solving entrepreneurial problems. Secondly, I also picked design thinking because I tried to find techniques for developing logic imaginations, systematic reasoning and intuitive imaginations that would enable me to build upon results not only to benefit my customers but also to satisfy their demands (Van et al. 2016). The increase developments in technology, have enabled me to understand that design thinking is far much beyond innovation and what an entrepreneur can offer people. Instead, design thinking primary focus is on technology and the effectiveness of the implemented innovation to impact on peoples life. One Of the primary reasons why most innovations fails is attributed to lack of proper research in developing an innovation. Design enterpreneurs should also not neglect the compatibility and sustainability fate of a design flexibility in the market (Dalsgaard, 2014). Design thinking process is not a one time process but rather a gradual process that expose individuals to different methods that in turn create learning opportunities for areas to be covered. At the start of our design thinking lesson, we were categorized into groups; In our groups, we were required to develop a design topic which we would later pass to other groups to draw pictures related to our topic choice ( See blog (1). July 2017). This would act as a genesis sample of ideology that our group intended to communicate. Design thinking requires innovators to develop a design protype that would help them monitor an innovative process. A protype is defined as model that is created with an intent of acting as a sample for the inniovative process (Reymen et al 2017). For instance, our group had developed a topic on home design which we again passed on another group to draw a picture on and again passed it to another group to do the same. The purpose of passing our design topic to othe r group was for evaluation purposes and analysis purposes of our chosen topic. Likewise, protyping is geared towards improving a design evaluation and sharpening designers knowledge and skills of the developed ideology. Protyping generally serves the purpose of providing information of the set expectations to the real working systems rather than providing a theoriticaal concept of the expectations. Prototyping also increases curiosity and individual interest in learning or working towards a target they desire to achieve. The design it learning session presented an element of proof of principle protype as it was draft of what was expected through out the learning session but not the actual content of the design that would be covered in future classes. The proof of principle prototype in design thinking, serves the role of substantianting main purposeful feature of the proposed design but does not contain final product functionality (Sandberg et al Holmstrm, 2015) Personal Development All the same, learning opportunity of the design period granted me the chance to discover that developing innovative designs requires individuals full concentration and awareness of what they inted to achieve. As an individual, I learnt that working in groups was paramount for any person that desired to succed. I develop team work skills that enabled me to easily collaborate with my group members and we were thus able to connect easily with other groups. Besides working with my group, my personal experience at the design experience classes enabled me develop a personal tolerance personality as I was required to work closely with members from other groups to ensure the stability of our design project. I discovered that design process had different methodologies that had to be followed in developing an innovative process (Norman Verganti, 2014). Brainstorming of the topic to base our design sharpened my creativity skills as I had to brainstorm of a topic over and over again; this enab led me to gain extensive knowledge of the basic concept of the design that I would later develop before commencing to settle for the concept. Individual development within a group is determined by an individual ability to collaboratively work with team members in fulfilling a group goals. Before beginning to work with a group the members should have better knowledge of what is expected of them; members can gain knowledge of the group expectation by brainstorming and developing a framework that would guide them through. Members should never settle for a certain project unless they are certain, sure and ready to withstand the consequences of the chosen design. For example at the first stage of the design thinking we brainstormed the topics over and over again with the help of other groups until our group was able to generate a topic picture. I felt that perspective of the group had been fulfilled and developed more interest to continually participate In the future projects. Knowledge Development Knowledge development is the process of acquiring external knowledge different from the internal experience that an individual already poses. Knowledge development process exposes an individual to crucial information that they may not obtain when restricted to one area. It promotes individual intellectual development as it involves cooperation and newer networks creations (Bellmann Melendez-Ortiz, 2013). Knowledge development encourages tolerance personality development and restricts dependence on an individual. Through knowledge development, individuals can attain vast knowledge and experience in their fields of concern thus promoting substantial development of individuals, organization or project agenda. Knowledge development requires an individual to be flexible to changes that come along with implementation process of an innovation and adapt to the changes whenever necessary. Knowledge development does not, however, imply inventing new ideas while ignoring the previous ones but it to a certain extent implies the adoption of new ideas while still putting into consideration and absorbing past ideologies that may be of help. Knowledge development discourages rigidity and widens an individual view of other undertaking perspectives that promote innovation and entrepreneurship development (Agyei Keengwe, 2014). For example, when I joined the design it class, my expectation after the course was to meet the lecturer the next lesson and exploit my learning interest (see the blog (1) July 2017). To my surprise, my previous class lecturer was not there in the "think new" class, and I had to see another lecturer to guide me through the course ( see the blog (2), August 2017), to my surprise, I found that lecturer to more exciting and friendly. I later realized that I had readily adapted to the changes due to my tolerance personality attitude, flexibility and desire to learn. In business and entrepreneurship trade, knowledge development serves the purpose of exposing an individual to newer opportunities while at the same time allowing people to learn from their experiences and that of other without necessarily having to design (Ingersoll et al.,2014). During my second class, we discovered on experimenting somethings to experience newer ideas (see the blog (2), August 2017). While in our third class we were exposed to a mind setting scenario where we shared our past experiences and developed and learned different problem-solving approaches from the solution (see the blog (3), August 2017). Adventures in the two classes enabled me to discover that knowledge development involved exploring newer opportunities, learning from your failures and that of others and developing a positive attitude. During three categories, I also discovered that the bottom-up design and structured design were paramount design methodologies for developing knowledge especially for ent erperneurs who desire to attract newer clients and retain their previous customers (Banfield, 2015). This is because the design class allowed us an opportunity to develop our topic thus helped in creating the work foundation which is a basis for bottom-up design. The think new, and the mindset up classes enabled me to identify outputs and inputs such as learning from others and developing problem-solving solutions which are structured design elements of design methodologies. From lessons drawn from first to third class, I learn that knowledge development in the business world has to be structured by entrepreneurs acknowledgement of what they want and entrepreneurs flexibility in creating newer opportunities for customers through learning and adapting different problem-solving techniques (Lee,2016). Our fourth class involved brainstorming and activities visualization which entailed finding a problem and using design thinking technique to solve the problem (see the blog (4), August 2017.). In our fifth class we carried out a journey mapping of our previous activities, compared it to our future plans and learnt on how to utilize our start and ending decisions (see blog (5), August 2017), while our sixth class was a reflection of our daily activities (see blog (6), September 2017). From which we were guided onto working with teams in the seventh class where we were given a dessert to prepare as a team ( see the blog (7), September 2017). From the fourth to the seventh class, I learnt tthat knowledge development is a process that required individuals to identify the different challenges to innovation, seek solution to such problems through reflecting on their past experiences and by weighing on the future implications of their solutions to the project design. From the fourth to the seventh class, I learned that knowledge development is a process that required individuals to identify the different challenges to innovation, seek the solution to such problems through reflecting on their past experiences and by weighing on the future implications of their solutions to the project design (Schein,2017). The eighth class involved getting feedback of our work process whereby we fetch input from our friends who are considered as customers. Each team discussed other group members work and developed possibly strategies for improving our products and customer service to clients (see the blog (8),13th September 2017), While the ninth class was based on personal development based on our derivatives from the last level. We later learned on developing a plan in our tenth class where we were introduced to marketing product presentation techniques (see the blog (10),22nd September 2017). From the experiences earned in these courses, I learned that gaining knowledge on clients feedback was essential as it helps entrepreneurs to research on better techniques for improving their businesses and to increase idea on persona creation. Persona creation boosts a product brand and thus prompting the need for better and improved product presentation technique which is an essential aspect of business devel opment. My learning reflection from the Design thinking and Entrepreneurial activity From the design thinking and entrepreneurial activity I have learned on the significance of participation in enhancing and promoting better design thinking and entrepreneurial developments. As an entrepreneur, I have determined to be dependent, reliable and accountable. A good entrepreneur is one who has been able to overcome all the odds of business challenges by believing in themselves despite the situation and working towards fulfilling their desired business goals (Ayala Manzano, 2014). During the second class, as an entrepreneur, I practiced dependence by consulting with another lecturer after I had missed my lecturer. As an entrepreneur and design thinker, I enhanced my teamwork ability by working and collaborating with other people to ensure the achievement of the organizations goals. My most significant milestone from the entrepreneurial activity was the ability to discuss our experiences with my group members and design solutions to solve the problems by developing problem- solving techniques and designs. Personal Weakness Nevertheless, the interactions during the learning activity ignored focusing on significant aspect of design thinking and entrepreneurship development such as looking for markets and expanding on customer niche after getting feedback from customers. More often than not, customers do exit from an organization either due to poor quality or due to better quality at a cheap or a more improved price (Sheu, 2014). Entrepreneurs can therefore not ignore the aspect of devising new products and customer service techniques after getting feedback from customers, creating persona alone is not enough to attract customers into a marketing niche. Secondly, the design thinking has ignored the marketing mix techniques in the design molding activity. Design thinking by entrepreneurship should be all rounded and focus on all aspects of business development. The entrepreneur activity has ignored the technological element in designing the business development plans which dramatically influences the inten sity of a b business development process. Another thing that the entrepreneurship has overlooked in design thinking is knowledge acquisition by involving external and more experienced professionals to guide and train people through advanced design thinking processes that will promote a globalized developed business. Another personal weakness portrayed form the entrepreneurship and design thinking activity is that people are not allowed chance to work alone as they are working in teams throughout the program. While teamwork is encouraged, people should also be encouraged to work dependently to avoid social loafing and prevent and over-dependence on other individuals. Areas That Need Development Training Technology advancement Independence Action Plan Of Key Developments And Activities Within The Next 6 Months Entrepreneurs should attend more training o design thinking to equip themselves with more knowledge and skills on significant design concepts development. Practice, exposes an individual to newer opportunities, expand their understanding of the design cycles and gives trainees a chance to learn from the failures of professionals (Millard Richardson, 2015). I will advocate for external training professionals in our college to assist to provide a better understanding of the design approach. Secondly ,I will conduct further research on free online training sites and encourage my friend to join such sessions. I will also advocate for training of the various marketing mix as businesses entrepreneurs and innovators cannot prosper without considering the functionality of marketing mix principles in influencing business market and competition (Haynes, 2015) Technology Advancement I would encourage the use of technologically advanced techniques in guiding people through the design process. Some of the ways of applying technology are to teach people on how to make good use of the internet in researching and establishing networks. The world has gone digital, and we can't, therefore, ignore the benefits of globalization by being limited to specific fields. Technology advancement in the mode of presentation and learning will foster better skills atainance and improve an individual knowledge awareness of what is happening around the world. Encourage Independence Teamwork and team collaboration are important determinants of the group and organizational development. However, some members may take advantage of the team and exploit other person efforts in the organization. Members should be encouraged to do other functions solely rather than in a group ( Schippers, 2014).This will help people to think out of the box and also develop a broad and sharp means of solving conflicts. I intend to disperse group work, encourage students to work on some projects individually and share their experiences with colleagues. References Agyei, D. D., Keengwe, J. (2014). Using technology pedagogical content knowledge development to economics learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 155-171. Ayala, J. C., Manzano, G. (2014). The resilience of the entrepreneur. Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 126-135. Banfield, R. (2015). Design Leadership: How Top Design Leaders Build and Grow Successful Organizations. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.". Bellmann, C., Melendez-Ortiz, R. (Eds.). (2013). Trading in Knowledge:" Development Perspectives on TRIPS, Trade and Sustainability." Routledge. Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Pragmatism and design thinking. International Journal of design, 8(1). Haynes, S. W. (2015). Combat mindset: the importance of training. Ingersoll, C., Jenkins, J. M., Lux, K. (2014). Teacher knowledge development in early field experiences. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(3), 363-382. lee, J. (2016).Deloitte. Retrieved from Deloitte.com:https://www2.deloitte.com/ca/en/pages/consumer-business/articles/consumer-driven-innovation.html Millard, K., Richardson, M. (2015). On the importance of training data sample selection in random forest image classification: A case study in peatland ecosystem mapping. Remote sensing, 7(7), 8489-851 Norman, D. A., Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. technology management and meaning change. Design issues, 30(1), 78-96. Reymen, I., Berends, H., Oudehand, R., Stultins, R. (2017). Decision making for business model development: a process study of effectuation and causation in new technology?based ventures. RD Management, 47(4), 595-606. Sandberg, J., Holmstrm, J., Napier, N., Levn, P. (2015). Balancing diversity in innovation networks: Trading zones in university-industry RD collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 44-69. Schein, E. H. (2017). Organization development: A Jossey-Bass reader. John Wiley Sons. Schippers, M. C. (2014). Social loafing tendencies and team performance: The compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Learning Education, 13(1), 62-81. Sheu, G. (2014). Price, quality, and variety: Measuring the gains from trade in differentiated products. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 66-89. van Rens, B., van der Borgh, W. M., Reymen, I. I. (2016). DESIGN THINKING AND SALES.